Friday, May 30, 2008

Mahathir should be charged for sedition.

He was the one who amended the Fedral Constitution to remove the ruler's immunity from criminal prosecution under a special court.
Therefore if rulers cannot even be exempted from criminal prosecution then why is the former premier not brought to court for his seditious comments in Johore when he accused the non malays were gradually taking away the rights of the malays. ?
Then in Japan for a conference he went to say that extremists non-malays were making unfair demands on the govt. If anybody else had uttered those words they would have been classified as seditious and charged accordingly.Then may I ask why is not Mahathir charged for his seditious comments?Being an ex -premier does not mean he is immune to the laws of the country which even the rulers are not exempted.
The Attorney-General must display fairness in prosecuting offenders who have infringed on any of our legislated laws and failing to do so would give the perception that there are two laws in the country, one for the ordinary citizens and one for our political leaders.

2 comments:

amen said...

CORRECT!! ALL WHAT TUN SAID IS CORRECT! ITS A FACT, ITS HAPPENING.....NOT ONLY IN JOHOR>> WHOLE MALAYSIA. THINK TUN REMARKS SERVE AS REMINDER TO MALAYS AND NOT FOR OTHERS TO WORRY. LIKE FATHER TELLING SON DONT SELL GRANDFATHER LAND.what is wrong with it!!

moose said...

Are u a Malaysian?? If u are, obviously u don't deserve to be one.